Something they’ll Never Have (Part II)

This is Part II of a multi-post piece.  Click here for Part I

The Bloody Sock

There are certain things that red Sox fans throw up in the faces of Yankee fans during argument. One of the items on that list is the Curt Schilling’s Game 6 performance. The seven inning, four hit, one run masterpiece might not be enough had that been all there was to mention. But, as anyone who’s ever followed Major League Baseball has heard, Game 6 will forever be known as “The Bloody Sock Game”.

Click for full size image.

Curt Schilling was brought to the Red Sox because he was a Yankee killer.  He and Randy Johnson had brought a World Series victory to expansion Arizona in 2001 at the expense of Jeter and the then thought of as unbeatable Bombers. When Schilling became a free agent, he was courted hard by the Red Sox front office.  In the end, it was the lure of making history – bringing that elusive championship to a downtrodden Red Sox Nation – that helped make the decision.

In 2004, Schilling lead American League 21-6 record, posting a 3.26.  He was second in the Cy Young vote, an All-Star, and at least in the conversation where league MVP was concerned.  The season was just about everything that Red Sox general manager Theo Epstein could have hoped for.  But as the season drew to a close and the post-season began, Schilling began showing signs of wear.  Namely a sore ankle that was causing some concern.

Click for full size image.

As it turned out, Schilling had a torn peroneal retinaculum, a sheath in his right foot that keeps a tendon in place as the foot flexes. Without the sheath, the tendon moves freely over the large ankle bone and can be painful as well as unstable. Schilling was a right-handed pitcher, meaning that his right foot was his plant or push-off foot. Instability in that ankle would have resulted in diminished power, but also might risk greater injury.

Before the game the loose tendon was sutured through the skin with a local anesthetic. The procedure, no sometimes called the Schilling Tendon Procedure, is a temporary fix. The sutures need to be removed as soon as the player is done playing. In many cases they are torn by that time, as well.

Perhaps the most enduring image of that series is the shot of Schilling’s hand coming down to adjust his shoe and the obvious blood seeping through the sutures and staining his sock. As side from the obvious courage and dedication that Schilling displayed playing hurt, the move met well with “Cowboy Up,” first baseman Kevin Millar’s rallying cry. Not to mention that there could hardly be a more dramatic notion that a member of the Red Sox who really had a red sock – red from blood.

The astounding significance of Schilling’s performance was made all the more wonderful for Sox fans by the subsequent attempts to belittle it made by Yankee fans and New York press. Accusations were flung that suggested the stain was paint or even ketchup! As the ESPN documentary “30 for 30: Four Days in October” pointed out, the fox camera’s were on Schilling incessantly in and out of the dugout. It seems unlikely that, had Fox Sports commentators Joe Buck or Tim McCarver noticed Schilling painting his sock (or adding condiments to it) they would have failed to mention it.

That sock resides in the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York. That 139 miles is probably not nearly far enough from Yankee Stadium to suit Yankee fans.

Part III coming soon…

Something They’ll Never Have (Part I)

Twenty-seven. The New York Yankees have twenty-seven World Series. Barring the impossible to imagine ending of the franchise, there is a better-than-likely chance that no other professional baseball team will ever pass the Yankees in terms of their number of championships. But even without any real hope of surmounting them, Boston Red Sox fans have something that the Yankees and their fans don’t have. There is something that Red Sox Nation has that The Bronx Bombers and their minions will never, ever get. That one mystical item can be referenced with relative accuracy with one term: The 2004 ALCS.

Click for full size image.
Click for full size image.

(more…)

2011 Reading List: Knockemstiff

Knockemstiff by Donald ray Pollock
July 7 – July 19

( 4 stars)

Most people who do any reading will tell you they have read a book (or several) that take place in a locale that they then want to visit.  Based on the author’s descriptions of the places and the people in them, after the book is done you’re drawn to the place.  Knockemstiff refers to a real town in Ohio, but based on the author’s depiction of the place and its denizens, I’m thinking it is a place to actively avoid.

In all seriousness, Pollock mentions in the acknowledgements section of the book that the town of Knockemstiff was his hometown, was a nice place and had many good people.  Why none of them made the book is up for debate  .  A collection of interconnected short stories that take place between the early 50′s and present day, Knockemstiff is rife with drug addicts, pedophiles, welfare defrauds, alcoholics, abusive spouses, and deviants of other varying ilks.  The town resembles a wasteland from a Cormac McCarthy novel, a place with fallen down structures, escaped opportunities, and an almost pathological acceptance of the freaks and criminals that the book centers on.

The stories are well written, direct, and in most cases leave you wishing for more details despite the raw and unpleasant subjects they cover.  Not a book for the easily offended, Knockemstiff is a good read for a night (or a day, or week, or month) when you’re feeling dissatisfied with your fellow man, your surroundings, and life in general.  Use this as an elixir in those situations and you should come out of it with a solid “things could be a lot worse” recovery.

See the whole 2011 List…

2010 list…

http://i.imgur.com/RQl28.jpg

2011 Reading List: Skippy Dies

Skippy Dies by Paul Murray
June 20 – July 7

(3 stars)

Set in a modern-day Irish boarding school, Skippy Dies was funny, quirky, but rather slow at times.  The characters are likable, but predictable.

Even though the main character (or one of them) dies in the first few pages of the book, the story really just begins there – even for Skippy, himself.  There is adolescent wit, adult intrigue and regret and even a bit of sexual tension.  There are priests and Catholic dogma, bureaucracy, and domestic lack-of-tranquility.

I suppose you’d say there is a little something for everyone in Skippy Dies. Not what you’d call a page-turner, but not a bad read, overall.

See the whole 2011 List…

2010 list…

http://i.imgur.com/RQl28.jpg

Essential Man’s Library

I stumbled upon this list at artofmanliness.com and wanted to re-post it.  Red text indicates the ones I’ve read.  Blue means I read the title but not all or it.  Black means I’ve yet to get to it.

1. The Great Gatsby – F. Scott Fitzgerald
2. The Prince – Niccolo Machiavelli
3. Slaughter-house Five – Kurt Vonnegut
4. 1984 – George Orwell
5. The Republic – Plato
6. The Brothers Karamazov – Fyodor Dostoevsky
7. The Catcher in the Rye – J.D. Salinger
8. The Wealth of Nations – Adam Smith
9. For Whom the Bell Tolls – Ernest Hemingway
10. The Picture of Dorian Gray – Oscar Wilde
11. The Grapes of Wrath – John Steinbeck
12. Brave New World – Aldous Huxley (more…)

Twenty-six Down…

I’ve never been a great maker of New Year’s resolutions, but I made one this year.  I promised myself that I would read 52 books by the end of 2011.  That, of course, works out to one per week.

Through March I was off and rolling.  With my new Kindle in hand and some Winter free time, I was blowing away titles at the rate of two a week.  It’s a good thing, too, because since baseball season has started, not to mention Summer in general, I’ve slowed considerably.

The good news is I just went through and tallied up and right now I’m reading my 27th book of the year.  Being that it is exactly midway through June, that puts me about two books ahead.

Right now I’m reading “The Psychopath Test”, by Jon Ronson.

Assuming the rest of the summer will be slow, I’m looking for a good push between the end of the World Series and the Christmas week to bring me home.

Wish me luck.

One of the Scariest Quotes I’ve Ever Read

In reading the book What’s So Great About Christianity by Dinesh D’Souza (I’ll do a review when I’m finished,) I came upon a quote from Richard Dawkins, a British biologist who, as a devout atheist, has made a career out of espousing pure Darwinism and not just arguing against religion and Creationism, but lampooning the concepts and railing against them.

Obviously, I don’t agree with Mr. Dawkins’ views.  I am a Christian and make no apologies for such.  I respect his right to his views.  But it seems clear from this quote that Mr. Dawkins does not respect my right to mine, nor that of my right to raise my children.

He has referred to monotheism (the belief in one God) as “The great unmentionable evil at the center of our culture…” and has suggested that “atheists” should start being called “brights” instead, the obvious insinuation being that the rest of us would then be the “dulls”.

This quote, though, made a chill run up my spine. In his book The God Dellusion (snappy title, huh?) he wrote:

“How much do we regard children as being the property of their parents? It’s one thing to say people should be free to believe whatever they like, but should they be free to impose their beliefs on their children? Is there something to be said for society stepping in? What about bringing up children to believe manifest falsehoods? Isn’t it always a form of child abuse to label children as possessors of beliefs that they are too young to have thought out?”

As a parent and an American, I find the assertion that my parental rights do not include teaching my children about my beliefs, let alone that doing such would constitute abuse as patently absurd.  The idea that an educated and, as such we then assume intelligent man, would suggest such a thing borders on psychotic.  Is Mr. Dawkins so afraid of the opposing side on his argument that he would really espouse criminalizing a basic tenant of childrearing?

If it were not for the constantly repeating evidences that show us that even the most absurd idea can gain support, I would brush off such radical and absurd posturing by an advocate of a position that (despite what atheists contend) losing support, not gaining it.

In the end, my response to Mr. Dawkins, now, as it is usually is simply this:  I’ll keep you in my prayers.

Copyright 2009 - 2011 Miscellany Buffet - All Rights Reserved.